https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128302 Payment of the entire excise duty after clearance of goods before disposal of the appeal meant Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was not attracted, so the penalty under that rule was set aside. The Tribunal nonetheless held that the underlying contravention continued to justify penalty under Rule 27, which permits a maximum penalty of Rs. 5,000 per offence, and sustained the penalty at that limit. As the matter arose from two show-cause notices, the Rule 27 penalty was maintained separately for each notice. en-us Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128302 Payment of the entire excise duty after clearance of goods before disposal of the appeal meant Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was not attracted, so the penalty under that rule was set aside. The Tribunal nonetheless held that the underlying contravention continued to justify penalty under Rule 27, which permits a maximum penalty of Rs. 5,000 per offence, and sustained the penalty at that limit. As the matter arose from two show-cause notices, the Rule 27 penalty was maintained separately for each notice. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128302