<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1066 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the valuation of goods in a High Sea Sale transaction. The Tribunal upheld the agreed price of US $31,671, rejecting the Departmental Representative&#039;s argument to increase the value by 2%. Emphasizing the importance of honoring agreed prices in such transactions, the Tribunal ruled that the documented agreement between the parties should dictate the valuation for duty liability. The decision underscores the significance of clear documentation and adherence to contractual terms in determining the value of goods in similar transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:51:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1066 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the valuation of goods in a High Sea Sale transaction. The Tribunal upheld the agreed price of US $31,671, rejecting the Departmental Representative&#039;s argument to increase the value by 2%. Emphasizing the importance of honoring agreed prices in such transactions, the Tribunal ruled that the documented agreement between the parties should dictate the valuation for duty liability. The decision underscores the significance of clear documentation and adherence to contractual terms in determining the value of goods in similar transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>