<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 944 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128290</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal rejected the ROA application due to the appellant&#039;s persistent non-compliance with deposit orders and failure to adhere to previous directives despite multiple opportunities and extensions granted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with its orders and upheld the dismissal of the appeal in light of the appellant&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:21:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 944 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128290</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal rejected the ROA application due to the appellant&#039;s persistent non-compliance with deposit orders and failure to adhere to previous directives despite multiple opportunities and extensions granted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with its orders and upheld the dismissal of the appeal in light of the appellant&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>