<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 581 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128273</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeals on the demand of National Calamity Contingency Duty (NCCD) on tobacco essence for captive consumption in chewing tobacco manufacturing. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal emphasized revenue neutrality, stating that paying duty on the intermediate product was offset by the duty on the final product, establishing revenue neutrality. The decision underscored the significance of revenue neutrality in excise duty matters and upheld the order based on this principle, highlighting the exemption issues, excisability of goods, and precedent considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 581 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128273</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeals on the demand of National Calamity Contingency Duty (NCCD) on tobacco essence for captive consumption in chewing tobacco manufacturing. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal emphasized revenue neutrality, stating that paying duty on the intermediate product was offset by the duty on the final product, establishing revenue neutrality. The decision underscored the significance of revenue neutrality in excise duty matters and upheld the order based on this principle, highlighting the exemption issues, excisability of goods, and precedent considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>