<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 771 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside penalties on registered dealers and manufacturers of final products, rejecting all appeals by the Revenue. It found that manufacturers availed credit based on valid invoices from registered dealers, deeming the disallowance of credit by the original authority unsubstantiated. The Tribunal referenced a prior case where a similar issue was resolved in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the entitlement to credit based on valid documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:38:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 771 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside penalties on registered dealers and manufacturers of final products, rejecting all appeals by the Revenue. It found that manufacturers availed credit based on valid invoices from registered dealers, deeming the disallowance of credit by the original authority unsubstantiated. The Tribunal referenced a prior case where a similar issue was resolved in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the entitlement to credit based on valid documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>