<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 99 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128229</link>
    <description>An auctioneer selling specific goods owned by third parties, where the buyer knows the auctioneer is not the owner, is treated only as an agent and not as the seller or a party to the contract of sale. On that basis, such auction transactions do not amount to sales by the auctioneer for sales tax purposes under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The article also states that Explanation 2 to section 2(c), insofar as it extended the definition of dealer to cover such an auctioneer, exceeded the taxing power over sales of goods and was therefore ultra vires and void. The assessment and enforcement measures were consequently quashed, while assessment of goods owned by the auctioneer himself was left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:43:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 99 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128229</link>
      <description>An auctioneer selling specific goods owned by third parties, where the buyer knows the auctioneer is not the owner, is treated only as an agent and not as the seller or a party to the contract of sale. On that basis, such auction transactions do not amount to sales by the auctioneer for sales tax purposes under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The article also states that Explanation 2 to section 2(c), insofar as it extended the definition of dealer to cover such an auctioneer, exceeded the taxing power over sales of goods and was therefore ultra vires and void. The assessment and enforcement measures were consequently quashed, while assessment of goods owned by the auctioneer himself was left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>