<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 926 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128228</link>
    <description>A redemption order that fixed a specific time limit for exercising the option and converting gold into ornaments became incapable of further enforcement once that period expired. Because the appellant did not comply within time, the later request for condonation of delay and consequential redemption relief was treated as infructuous, especially since the goods had already been disposed of. The proper course would have been a timely rectification application against the earlier finding, and that remedy had also become time-barred. The Tribunal therefore declined to entertain the applications on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:49:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 926 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128228</link>
      <description>A redemption order that fixed a specific time limit for exercising the option and converting gold into ornaments became incapable of further enforcement once that period expired. Because the appellant did not comply within time, the later request for condonation of delay and consequential redemption relief was treated as infructuous, especially since the goods had already been disposed of. The proper course would have been a timely rectification application against the earlier finding, and that remedy had also become time-barred. The Tribunal therefore declined to entertain the applications on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>