<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1058 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128227</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the refund claim of Rs. 1,33,219/- for excess payment of differential duty by the company, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the time-barred balance amount of Rs. 12,67,122. The Commissioner (Appeals) was found to have appropriately considered the unjust enrichment principle and legal precedents, supporting the company&#039;s position. The Tribunal emphasized that the evidence demonstrated the duty burden was not passed on and that the refund claim was timely filed, ultimately ruling in favor of the company and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:37:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1058 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128227</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the refund claim of Rs. 1,33,219/- for excess payment of differential duty by the company, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the time-barred balance amount of Rs. 12,67,122. The Commissioner (Appeals) was found to have appropriately considered the unjust enrichment principle and legal precedents, supporting the company&#039;s position. The Tribunal emphasized that the evidence demonstrated the duty burden was not passed on and that the refund claim was timely filed, ultimately ruling in favor of the company and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>