<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1057 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128225</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to allow the refund claims, emphasizing the importance of considering the specific circumstances of the case, including the nature of manufacturing operations and the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1057 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128225</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to allow the refund claims, emphasizing the importance of considering the specific circumstances of the case, including the nature of manufacturing operations and the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>