<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 98 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128224</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan High Court ruled that Durries were not exempt from sales tax under Schedule B to the Act as handloom cloth. The court held that the exemption clause should be strictly construed, and Durries did not fall within the scope of handloom cloth based on the ordinary meaning of the term &quot;cloth&quot; and the specific items listed in the exemption notification. The judgment emphasized the importance of interpreting tax exemptions in accordance with legislative intent to prevent undue burden on the community. Consequently, the court denied the exemption for Durries, leaving parties to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 98 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128224</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan High Court ruled that Durries were not exempt from sales tax under Schedule B to the Act as handloom cloth. The court held that the exemption clause should be strictly construed, and Durries did not fall within the scope of handloom cloth based on the ordinary meaning of the term &quot;cloth&quot; and the specific items listed in the exemption notification. The judgment emphasized the importance of interpreting tax exemptions in accordance with legislative intent to prevent undue burden on the community. Consequently, the court denied the exemption for Durries, leaving parties to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>