<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 922 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128206</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI ruled in favor of the department in a case involving the clearance of packing materials without reversing Cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the packing material was not used for packing the furniture, necessitating the reversal of credit. It was determined that the invoices did not adequately disclose the clearance of packing materials. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the respondents failed to establish their case on merit or limitation. The departmental appeal was allowed, and the original order was restored, setting aside the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 922 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128206</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI ruled in favor of the department in a case involving the clearance of packing materials without reversing Cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the packing material was not used for packing the furniture, necessitating the reversal of credit. It was determined that the invoices did not adequately disclose the clearance of packing materials. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the respondents failed to establish their case on merit or limitation. The departmental appeal was allowed, and the original order was restored, setting aside the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>