<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 96 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128201</link>
    <description>Tobacco purchases were treated as taxable under rule 5(2) of the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Rules, because the levy applied to purchases liable to tax and tobacco was treated as falling within &quot;agricultural produce&quot; for that rule. The argument that the claimant was only a purchaser, not a seller, was rejected. The constitutional claim to exemption also failed: the sales were completed within Hyderabad, the buyer took delivery and stored the goods before moving them across State lines, and later movement as the buyer&#039;s own goods did not make the transactions inter-State trade or commerce under Article 286.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:02:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 96 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128201</link>
      <description>Tobacco purchases were treated as taxable under rule 5(2) of the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Rules, because the levy applied to purchases liable to tax and tobacco was treated as falling within &quot;agricultural produce&quot; for that rule. The argument that the claimant was only a purchaser, not a seller, was rejected. The constitutional claim to exemption also failed: the sales were completed within Hyderabad, the buyer took delivery and stored the goods before moving them across State lines, and later movement as the buyer&#039;s own goods did not make the transactions inter-State trade or commerce under Article 286.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>