<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 918 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner, ruling that the discount passed on to buyers should not be included in the assessable value for taxation purposes. The Tribunal found that the discounts were part of the Respondent&#039;s trade policy to boost sales and did not result in any unlawful practices or prejudice the revenue. There was no evidence of undue benefit to buyers or any flow back of value to the seller, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:47:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 918 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner, ruling that the discount passed on to buyers should not be included in the assessable value for taxation purposes. The Tribunal found that the discounts were part of the Respondent&#039;s trade policy to boost sales and did not result in any unlawful practices or prejudice the revenue. There was no evidence of undue benefit to buyers or any flow back of value to the seller, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>