https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128184 Imported goods held liable to confiscation for misdeclaration remained subject to redemption fine even after release, because the test report supported the Revenue's classification and the importer failed to secure an accepted retest. The Tribunal held that release of the goods did not extinguish the power to impose redemption fine where differential duty was recoverable on account of misdeclaration. The impugned order was modified only to add redemption fine, while confiscation and differential duty were left undisturbed. en-us Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:56:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128184 Imported goods held liable to confiscation for misdeclaration remained subject to redemption fine even after release, because the test report supported the Revenue's classification and the importer failed to secure an accepted retest. The Tribunal held that release of the goods did not extinguish the power to impose redemption fine where differential duty was recoverable on account of misdeclaration. The impugned order was modified only to add redemption fine, while confiscation and differential duty were left undisturbed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128184