<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 912 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128173</link>
    <description>The tribunal condoned a 63-day delay in filing an appeal due to a key officer&#039;s sickness. The main issues involved the reversal of credit on molasses used in rectified spirit manufacturing and duty demand for transferring molasses without permission. The appellants disputed the Revenue&#039;s FIFO method for credit reversal and the duty demand under Rule 8 of Cenvat Credit Rules. The tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments concerning Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules and the demand under Rule 8, leading to a deposit of over Rs. 26 lacs. The stay application was allowed for the balance amount of duty demand, interest, and penalties, disposing of related applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 912 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128173</link>
      <description>The tribunal condoned a 63-day delay in filing an appeal due to a key officer&#039;s sickness. The main issues involved the reversal of credit on molasses used in rectified spirit manufacturing and duty demand for transferring molasses without permission. The appellants disputed the Revenue&#039;s FIFO method for credit reversal and the duty demand under Rule 8 of Cenvat Credit Rules. The tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments concerning Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules and the demand under Rule 8, leading to a deposit of over Rs. 26 lacs. The stay application was allowed for the balance amount of duty demand, interest, and penalties, disposing of related applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>