<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 910 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision to confiscate seized PVC scrap under Central Excise Rules, as the scrap was captively used and fully exempt from duty, rendering non-maintenance of the stock account insufficient grounds for penalty or confiscation. The Tribunal also overturned the penalty imposed on the appellant, ruling that the non-maintenance of the stock account for the exempt scrap did not warrant such sanctions. The requirement to maintain a stock account for excisable goods was deemed unnecessary in this context.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:14:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 910 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision to confiscate seized PVC scrap under Central Excise Rules, as the scrap was captively used and fully exempt from duty, rendering non-maintenance of the stock account insufficient grounds for penalty or confiscation. The Tribunal also overturned the penalty imposed on the appellant, ruling that the non-maintenance of the stock account for the exempt scrap did not warrant such sanctions. The requirement to maintain a stock account for excisable goods was deemed unnecessary in this context.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>