<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (1) TMI 61 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128164</link>
    <description>Where the dealer fails to produce stock books, ledger accounts, a sugar stock register, and the annual consolidated return, the authorities may reasonably doubt the reliability of the accounts and reject them for a best judgment assessment under section 13(3) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act. The assessment was upheld. A penalty for non-payment of admitted tax is valid under section 14(3a) where the tax due under the return was not paid without reasonable cause, and a clerical error in the notice&#039;s section reference caused no prejudice because the dealer knew the true basis of the proceeding. The penalty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:03:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (1) TMI 61 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128164</link>
      <description>Where the dealer fails to produce stock books, ledger accounts, a sugar stock register, and the annual consolidated return, the authorities may reasonably doubt the reliability of the accounts and reject them for a best judgment assessment under section 13(3) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act. The assessment was upheld. A penalty for non-payment of admitted tax is valid under section 14(3a) where the tax due under the return was not paid without reasonable cause, and a clerical error in the notice&#039;s section reference caused no prejudice because the dealer knew the true basis of the proceeding. The penalty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>