https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128157 The appeals filed by the Revenue against a common impugned order setting aside penalties imposed on several individuals were dismissed. The judgment found that there was insufficient evidence to support allegations of collusion between the Superintendent of Customs and the exporter to deceive the government. It was noted that the Superintendent's role was limited to giving examination orders and not directly involved in physical examination or export of goods. The court upheld the decision to set aside the penalties, citing lack of sustainability in law and on facts. en-us Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128157 The appeals filed by the Revenue against a common impugned order setting aside penalties imposed on several individuals were dismissed. The judgment found that there was insufficient evidence to support allegations of collusion between the Superintendent of Customs and the exporter to deceive the government. It was noted that the Superintendent's role was limited to giving examination orders and not directly involved in physical examination or export of goods. The court upheld the decision to set aside the penalties, citing lack of sustainability in law and on facts. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128157