<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 669 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128147</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, determining that the amount received by the assessee, engaged in real estate development, should be treated as business income rather than income from house property for the assessment year 2001-02. The court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the agreement between the assessee and the company was a genuine business arrangement requiring active involvement in store management, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:42:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 669 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128147</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, determining that the amount received by the assessee, engaged in real estate development, should be treated as business income rather than income from house property for the assessment year 2001-02. The court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the agreement between the assessee and the company was a genuine business arrangement requiring active involvement in store management, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>