<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 94 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128140</link>
    <description>A sale is inter-State only where the contract itself requires movement of goods from one State to another, or where out-of-State delivery is an integral term of the bargain; mere post-sale transport across State borders is insufficient. Applying that principle, the coal transactions were held not to be inter-State sales because no express or implied term required delivery outside the State, the sellers&#039; obligation ended when the coal was put on rail at the collieries, and later despatches followed buyers&#039; rail-head instructions. Clause 10-A of the Colliery Control Order, 1945, did not change the character of the sales, and section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 reflected the same test. The Article 286 protection therefore did not apply, and the transactions remained liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 94 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128140</link>
      <description>A sale is inter-State only where the contract itself requires movement of goods from one State to another, or where out-of-State delivery is an integral term of the bargain; mere post-sale transport across State borders is insufficient. Applying that principle, the coal transactions were held not to be inter-State sales because no express or implied term required delivery outside the State, the sellers&#039; obligation ended when the coal was put on rail at the collieries, and later despatches followed buyers&#039; rail-head instructions. Clause 10-A of the Colliery Control Order, 1945, did not change the character of the sales, and section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 reflected the same test. The Article 286 protection therefore did not apply, and the transactions remained liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>