<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 94 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128140</link>
    <description>Inter-State sale status depends on whether the contract itself requires movement of goods across State borders or makes out-of-State delivery an integral term. Mere post-sale transport is insufficient. Coal allotted under the controlled scheme was paid for in advance, and the sellers completed delivery upon placing it on rail at the collieries. Buyers&#039; rail-head instructions for out-of-State despatch reflected their own requests rather than a contractual obligation of the sellers. Diversion powers under the Colliery Control Order did not change the completed-sale character, and the Central Sales Tax Act applies the same sale-occasioned movement test. The transactions were therefore liable to sales tax and did not receive Article 286 protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 94 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128140</link>
      <description>Inter-State sale status depends on whether the contract itself requires movement of goods across State borders or makes out-of-State delivery an integral term. Mere post-sale transport is insufficient. Coal allotted under the controlled scheme was paid for in advance, and the sellers completed delivery upon placing it on rail at the collieries. Buyers&#039; rail-head instructions for out-of-State despatch reflected their own requests rather than a contractual obligation of the sellers. Diversion powers under the Colliery Control Order did not change the completed-sale character, and the Central Sales Tax Act applies the same sale-occasioned movement test. The transactions were therefore liable to sales tax and did not receive Article 286 protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>