<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 249 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128135</link>
    <description>A beneficial tenancy amendment may apply to pending proceedings where retrospective operation is express or necessarily implied and no final vested right has crystallised. The Court held that the 1952 amendment to the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act revived the respondents&#039; protected tenant status in the pending suit, because the earlier exclusion was deleted and the protective regime had to be construed liberally. It further held that the civil court could not continue once the amended tenancy protection applied. The landlords&#039; appeal was dismissed, and the connected appeal succeeded consequentially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 249 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128135</link>
      <description>A beneficial tenancy amendment may apply to pending proceedings where retrospective operation is express or necessarily implied and no final vested right has crystallised. The Court held that the 1952 amendment to the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act revived the respondents&#039; protected tenant status in the pending suit, because the earlier exclusion was deleted and the protective regime had to be construed liberally. It further held that the civil court could not continue once the amended tenancy protection applied. The landlords&#039; appeal was dismissed, and the connected appeal succeeded consequentially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>