<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 903 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to violations of natural justice, specifically the denial of cross-examination opportunities to the appellants. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication with directions to allow cross-examination of witnesses. The Tribunal emphasized it had not made any judgment on the case&#039;s merits and permitted the parties to present their arguments and rely on legal precedents during the re-adjudication process. Stay petitions and appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 903 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to violations of natural justice, specifically the denial of cross-examination opportunities to the appellants. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication with directions to allow cross-examination of witnesses. The Tribunal emphasized it had not made any judgment on the case&#039;s merits and permitted the parties to present their arguments and rely on legal precedents during the re-adjudication process. Stay petitions and appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>