<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 901 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128129</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confiscating silver worth Rs. 2,04,700/- and imposing penalties, remanding the matter for a fresh decision. The appellants were granted the opportunity for cross-examination of panch witnesses and a personal hearing, citing a dispute over the place of silver recovery as crucial. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair decision and allowed both parties to present arguments during the hearing, ultimately allowing the appeals by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:50:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 901 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128129</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confiscating silver worth Rs. 2,04,700/- and imposing penalties, remanding the matter for a fresh decision. The appellants were granted the opportunity for cross-examination of panch witnesses and a personal hearing, citing a dispute over the place of silver recovery as crucial. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair decision and allowed both parties to present arguments during the hearing, ultimately allowing the appeals by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>