<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 446 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128120</link>
    <description>Commercial market complexes or bazars held by an intermediary vest in the State under Section 4(a) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, because the provision carries with it interests in hats, bazars, melas and allied sairati interests subject only to express statutory savings. Section 5 protects homesteads, but a homestead is a dwelling house used for residence or letting out with its appurtenant land, not rows of shops or premises continuously used for buying and selling. Reading the Act as a whole, the statute distinguishes saved homesteads from vested bazars, and the fact that shops existed on the land or that rents were collected does not change the commercial character of the property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 446 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128120</link>
      <description>Commercial market complexes or bazars held by an intermediary vest in the State under Section 4(a) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, because the provision carries with it interests in hats, bazars, melas and allied sairati interests subject only to express statutory savings. Section 5 protects homesteads, but a homestead is a dwelling house used for residence or letting out with its appurtenant land, not rows of shops or premises continuously used for buying and selling. Reading the Act as a whole, the statute distinguishes saved homesteads from vested bazars, and the fact that shops existed on the land or that rents were collected does not change the commercial character of the property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>