https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128105 Substitution of "after" with "upto" in the proviso to Section 13A(1)(c) of the Haryana Municipal Act was treated as a curative amendment correcting a drafting error and removing an absurdity. Because the change was intended to align the text with the original two-child norm introduced by the First Amendment Act, it operated retrospectively and related back to 5 April 1994. The disqualification therefore had to be tested from that date, and the challenge to the municipal disqualification failed, leaving the removal from office sustained. en-us Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128105 Substitution of "after" with "upto" in the proviso to Section 13A(1)(c) of the Haryana Municipal Act was treated as a curative amendment correcting a drafting error and removing an absurdity. Because the change was intended to align the text with the original two-child norm introduced by the First Amendment Act, it operated retrospectively and related back to 5 April 1994. The disqualification therefore had to be tested from that date, and the challenge to the municipal disqualification failed, leaving the removal from office sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128105