<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1037 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128093</link>
    <description>Imported goods were disputed on classification and on the applicability of the Insecticides Act regime, and the appellant relied on prior correspondence indicating that no NOC was required together with an earlier Tribunal view supporting its prima facie position. On that record, a strong prima facie case for interim relief was found, and complete waiver of pre-deposit of redemption fine and penalty was granted pending final disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:45:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1037 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128093</link>
      <description>Imported goods were disputed on classification and on the applicability of the Insecticides Act regime, and the appellant relied on prior correspondence indicating that no NOC was required together with an earlier Tribunal view supporting its prima facie position. On that record, a strong prima facie case for interim relief was found, and complete waiver of pre-deposit of redemption fine and penalty was granted pending final disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>