<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1034 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant correctly paid the amount under Rule 3(5)(A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, for selling capital goods as scrap. It was determined that the goods were unusable scrap and not still usable as capital goods, rejecting the revenue&#039;s demand for the reversal of the entire Cenvat credit. The Tribunal set aside the previous decision, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:25:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1034 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant correctly paid the amount under Rule 3(5)(A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, for selling capital goods as scrap. It was determined that the goods were unusable scrap and not still usable as capital goods, rejecting the revenue&#039;s demand for the reversal of the entire Cenvat credit. The Tribunal set aside the previous decision, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>