<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (3) TMI 52 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128085</link>
    <description>Where the Sales Tax Act prescribed a three-year limitation for issuing notice under section 11(2), that limit applied to the notice stage and not to completion of the assessment under section 11(1). An assessment could therefore be made after three years from the relevant period, but a notice issued beyond that period was barred. The appeals failed because the impugned notice was time-barred, and the order setting it aside remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:14:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (3) TMI 52 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128085</link>
      <description>Where the Sales Tax Act prescribed a three-year limitation for issuing notice under section 11(2), that limit applied to the notice stage and not to completion of the assessment under section 11(1). An assessment could therefore be made after three years from the relevant period, but a notice issued beyond that period was barred. The appeals failed because the impugned notice was time-barred, and the order setting it aside remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>