<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (7) TMI 50 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128064</link>
    <description>Explanation 2 to section 2(k) of the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act is treated as incorporating Article 286 of the Constitution by reference, so the constitutional sales-tax framework becomes part of the statutory definition of sale. On that basis, sales involving delivery in Hyderabad for consumption were taxable under the Act. The Sales Tax Laws Validation Act also validated inter-State sales levies for the specified period, removing the constitutional obstacle for that interval. In the remanded revision matters, the Tribunal still had to determine whether the respondents were merely non-resident agents and not dealers, while the connected writ petitions failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:28:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (7) TMI 50 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128064</link>
      <description>Explanation 2 to section 2(k) of the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act is treated as incorporating Article 286 of the Constitution by reference, so the constitutional sales-tax framework becomes part of the statutory definition of sale. On that basis, sales involving delivery in Hyderabad for consumption were taxable under the Act. The Sales Tax Laws Validation Act also validated inter-State sales levies for the specified period, removing the constitutional obstacle for that interval. In the remanded revision matters, the Tribunal still had to determine whether the respondents were merely non-resident agents and not dealers, while the connected writ petitions failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>