<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (6) TMI 20 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128062</link>
    <description>Section 4 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act was construed as a limited exemption provision aimed at preventing double taxation only for sales of goods already subjected to duty under the specified enactments. The court read the reference to goods on which duty is or may be levied with the opening reference to sales, so the protection applied only to the sales specifically covered by the section. The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption on French polish fell outside that scope, and the sales tax levy was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:55:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (6) TMI 20 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128062</link>
      <description>Section 4 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act was construed as a limited exemption provision aimed at preventing double taxation only for sales of goods already subjected to duty under the specified enactments. The court read the reference to goods on which duty is or may be levied with the opening reference to sales, so the protection applied only to the sales specifically covered by the section. The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption on French polish fell outside that scope, and the sales tax levy was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>