https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128058 Review jurisdiction under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is confined to error apparent, new matter, mistake or other sufficient reason, and cannot be used to rehear the case or reappreciate evidence. Questions such as readiness and willingness in a specific performance suit, novation, and discretionary relief under the Specific Relief Act, once decided on the appellate record, cannot be reopened in review merely because another view is possible. Subsequent events known to the parties and the court do not by themselves justify review. The High Court therefore exceeded the permissible limits of review jurisdiction in recalling its earlier appellate judgment and directing rehearing. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128058 Review jurisdiction under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is confined to error apparent, new matter, mistake or other sufficient reason, and cannot be used to rehear the case or reappreciate evidence. Questions such as readiness and willingness in a specific performance suit, novation, and discretionary relief under the Specific Relief Act, once decided on the appellate record, cannot be reopened in review merely because another view is possible. Subsequent events known to the parties and the court do not by themselves justify review. The High Court therefore exceeded the permissible limits of review jurisdiction in recalling its earlier appellate judgment and directing rehearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128058