<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 896 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Department in a case involving alleged fraudulent export claims by a steel manufacturer. The company faced duty demand, rebate recovery, and penalties due to discrepancies in production data and manufacturing practices. Despite the company&#039;s arguments supported by technical and financial reports, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Department, directing the company and its Director to deposit specific amounts for duty demand, rebate recovery, and penalties within a set timeframe. Compliance would result in a waiver of the remaining amounts, as per the Tribunal&#039;s directives to dispose of the stay petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:43:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 896 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Department in a case involving alleged fraudulent export claims by a steel manufacturer. The company faced duty demand, rebate recovery, and penalties due to discrepancies in production data and manufacturing practices. Despite the company&#039;s arguments supported by technical and financial reports, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Department, directing the company and its Director to deposit specific amounts for duty demand, rebate recovery, and penalties within a set timeframe. Compliance would result in a waiver of the remaining amounts, as per the Tribunal&#039;s directives to dispose of the stay petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>