https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128050 Confiscation of molasses stock and penalty were found unwarranted where the excess stock detected was only marginal and the discrepancy was reasonably explained by foaming and possible error in dip reading. The appellate authority had accepted that factual explanation, and no material was produced to dislodge that conclusion or justify interference. On that basis, the departmental appeal was rejected. en-us Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:28:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128050 Confiscation of molasses stock and penalty were found unwarranted where the excess stock detected was only marginal and the discrepancy was reasonably explained by foaming and possible error in dip reading. The appellate authority had accepted that factual explanation, and no material was produced to dislodge that conclusion or justify interference. On that basis, the departmental appeal was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128050