<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1026 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128048</link>
    <description>The Appeals for restoration were granted as the Applicants claimed non-receipt of hearing notices. The Appeals against the confiscation of goods for smuggling to Bangladesh were successful as the evidence of unauthorized exportation was lacking. The imposed penalties were set aside due to insufficient proof of smuggling allegations, resulting in the reversal of the impugned order and the allowance of the Appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1026 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128048</link>
      <description>The Appeals for restoration were granted as the Applicants claimed non-receipt of hearing notices. The Appeals against the confiscation of goods for smuggling to Bangladesh were successful as the evidence of unauthorized exportation was lacking. The imposed penalties were set aside due to insufficient proof of smuggling allegations, resulting in the reversal of the impugned order and the allowance of the Appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>