https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128044 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, M/s. EID Parry (India) Ltd., in a case concerning the classification of the product 'abda' as fertilizer under Chapter Sub-heading 3808. The Tribunal found that the demand for duty evasion, interest, and penalty was not sustainable as it relied on the Fertilizer Control Order without notifying the appellants. Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the plea of limitation, granting a complete waiver of pre-deposit and staying the recovery of dues pending appeal due to a prima facie case against the demand and penalty. en-us Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:07:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128044 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, M/s. EID Parry (India) Ltd., in a case concerning the classification of the product 'abda' as fertilizer under Chapter Sub-heading 3808. The Tribunal found that the demand for duty evasion, interest, and penalty was not sustainable as it relied on the Fertilizer Control Order without notifying the appellants. Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the plea of limitation, granting a complete waiver of pre-deposit and staying the recovery of dues pending appeal due to a prima facie case against the demand and penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128044