<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1022 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128031</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the denial of Cenvat credit on work-in-progress materials destroyed in a fire. The main issue was the demand and recovery of Cenvat credit under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, dismissing the jurisdictional objection raised by the JDR. The stay application was directed to be listed for a future date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:37:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1022 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128031</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the denial of Cenvat credit on work-in-progress materials destroyed in a fire. The main issue was the demand and recovery of Cenvat credit under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, dismissing the jurisdictional objection raised by the JDR. The stay application was directed to be listed for a future date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>