https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128030 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI involved the department's request to impose a penalty on the respondent under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The respondent lacked representation, and notice serving was impeded due to their premises being under another company's possession. The lower appellate authority found no grounds for penalty under Section 11AC, a crucial finding unchallenged by the Revenue. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming that no penalty under Section 11AC could be imposed on the respondent. en-us Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:30:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128030 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI involved the department's request to impose a penalty on the respondent under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The respondent lacked representation, and notice serving was impeded due to their premises being under another company's possession. The lower appellate authority found no grounds for penalty under Section 11AC, a crucial finding unchallenged by the Revenue. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming that no penalty under Section 11AC could be imposed on the respondent. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128030