<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1018 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128027</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD confirmed duty demand against the appellant for clandestine removal of Polyester Crimped Yarn. The Original Adjudicating Authority did not impose a penalty as duty was paid before the notice. The Commissioner (Appeals) enhanced the penalty to match the duty amount under Section 11AC. The appellant paid 25% of the penalty, arguing the remaining should be waived under the Proviso to Section 11AC. The Tribunal held that since no penalty was initially imposed, the appellant&#039;s 25% payment sufficed. The balance penalty was set aside, confirming the penalty for the amount already paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1018 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128027</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD confirmed duty demand against the appellant for clandestine removal of Polyester Crimped Yarn. The Original Adjudicating Authority did not impose a penalty as duty was paid before the notice. The Commissioner (Appeals) enhanced the penalty to match the duty amount under Section 11AC. The appellant paid 25% of the penalty, arguing the remaining should be waived under the Proviso to Section 11AC. The Tribunal held that since no penalty was initially imposed, the appellant&#039;s 25% payment sufficed. The balance penalty was set aside, confirming the penalty for the amount already paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>