<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (2) TMI 40 - BIHAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128023</link>
    <description>The Board ruled that the petitioner was not liable for sales tax on payments received for constructing Junior Officers&#039; residences but was liable for materials supplied under the Langat Singh College agreement in 1951-52. The decision was based on the presence or absence of clauses transferring property rights in the respective agreements, leading to differing conclusions on sales tax liability for the construction works undertaken by the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:35:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (2) TMI 40 - BIHAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128023</link>
      <description>The Board ruled that the petitioner was not liable for sales tax on payments received for constructing Junior Officers&#039; residences but was liable for materials supplied under the Langat Singh College agreement in 1951-52. The decision was based on the presence or absence of clauses transferring property rights in the respective agreements, leading to differing conclusions on sales tax liability for the construction works undertaken by the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>