https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128021 Writ jurisdiction was treated as inappropriate where the sales tax statute provided appeal, revision and reference remedies, and alleged fundamental rights infringement did not by itself justify bypassing those remedies. Tax-free purchases covered by a registration certificate were held not to extend to bleaching, dyeing and finishing of cloth belonging to third parties, because the exemption applied to goods used by the dealer in manufacturing goods for sale and the record did not show coverage for such processing on labour charges. The challenge therefore failed on maintainability and on merits, and the assessment was sustained. en-us Tue, 08 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:10:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128021 Writ jurisdiction was treated as inappropriate where the sales tax statute provided appeal, revision and reference remedies, and alleged fundamental rights infringement did not by itself justify bypassing those remedies. Tax-free purchases covered by a registration certificate were held not to extend to bleaching, dyeing and finishing of cloth belonging to third parties, because the exemption applied to goods used by the dealer in manufacturing goods for sale and the record did not show coverage for such processing on labour charges. The challenge therefore failed on maintainability and on merits, and the assessment was sustained. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 08 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128021