<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 895 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128020</link>
    <description>An appeal against an order recorded as emanating from the Chief Commissioner of Customs does not lie before the Commissioner (Appeals); it is triable before the Tribunal. The Tribunal examined the order-in-original and the communication to the appellants, found that the impugned decision was the Chief Commissioner&#039;s order and not an independent Assistant Commissioner order, and accordingly upheld the view that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction. On the appellants&#039; request, the Tribunal then permitted withdrawal of the appeals and dismissed them as withdrawn, while preserving liberty to pursue the appropriate remedy before the competent forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 895 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128020</link>
      <description>An appeal against an order recorded as emanating from the Chief Commissioner of Customs does not lie before the Commissioner (Appeals); it is triable before the Tribunal. The Tribunal examined the order-in-original and the communication to the appellants, found that the impugned decision was the Chief Commissioner&#039;s order and not an independent Assistant Commissioner order, and accordingly upheld the view that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction. On the appellants&#039; request, the Tribunal then permitted withdrawal of the appeals and dismissed them as withdrawn, while preserving liberty to pursue the appropriate remedy before the competent forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>