<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1017 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128013</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of the Appellant in a case concerning the valuation of goods for central excise duty. The Tribunal held that the valuation should be done in accordance with Rule 7 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000, which requires considering the price at the time nearest to the removal of goods. As the goods were transferred to the Appellant&#039;s own depots, the Tribunal determined that the value prevailing at the depot on 9-5-05 should be used for valuation instead of a higher value from 27-4-05. Consequently, the demand against the Appellant was deemed unsustainable, leading to the waiver of the pre-deposit requirement and a stay of the impugned order during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:39:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1017 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128013</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of the Appellant in a case concerning the valuation of goods for central excise duty. The Tribunal held that the valuation should be done in accordance with Rule 7 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000, which requires considering the price at the time nearest to the removal of goods. As the goods were transferred to the Appellant&#039;s own depots, the Tribunal determined that the value prevailing at the depot on 9-5-05 should be used for valuation instead of a higher value from 27-4-05. Consequently, the demand against the Appellant was deemed unsustainable, leading to the waiver of the pre-deposit requirement and a stay of the impugned order during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>