<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (5) TMI 20 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128004</link>
    <description>Renewal of a purchasing dealer&#039;s registration certificate was treated as operating for the entire financial year for which it was granted, because the Act and Rules did not limit renewal to the date of the renewal order. Although the application had to be filed in advance and inquiries could be completed later, the scheme and prescribed form indicated that renewal related back to the commencement of the year. The proviso to rule 27(2) was read consistently with that position, as it focused on whether the certificate had been renewed for the relevant year. Sales made before the renewal order were therefore entitled to exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:50:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (5) TMI 20 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128004</link>
      <description>Renewal of a purchasing dealer&#039;s registration certificate was treated as operating for the entire financial year for which it was granted, because the Act and Rules did not limit renewal to the date of the renewal order. Although the application had to be filed in advance and inquiries could be completed later, the scheme and prescribed form indicated that renewal related back to the commencement of the year. The proviso to rule 27(2) was read consistently with that position, as it focused on whether the certificate had been renewed for the relevant year. Sales made before the renewal order were therefore entitled to exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>