<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 890 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128003</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Central Tucking Units qualify as spare parts of shuttleless looms, making them eligible for a concessional rate of duty. The correct valuation of the second-hand units was determined to be 400 EURO per piece. Consequently, the duty assessment was adjusted, and the redemption fine and penalties were reduced for the appellant company and an individual involved. The Commissioner was instructed to recalculate the duty demand in accordance with these findings, resulting in a modification of the initial order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 890 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128003</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Central Tucking Units qualify as spare parts of shuttleless looms, making them eligible for a concessional rate of duty. The correct valuation of the second-hand units was determined to be 400 EURO per piece. Consequently, the duty assessment was adjusted, and the redemption fine and penalties were reduced for the appellant company and an individual involved. The Commissioner was instructed to recalculate the duty demand in accordance with these findings, resulting in a modification of the initial order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>