<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (11) TMI 47 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127990</link>
    <description>After State reorganisation, sales involving movement of goods between the Telangana and Andhra areas of the same State remained intra-State transactions. The court noted that the reorganisation law continued pre-existing local sales tax enactments in force in the transferred territories until adaptation, but that continuation did not alter the constitutional position that both areas formed one State. Because inter-State trade requires movement of goods from one State to another under the contract of sale, movement within the same State could not be treated as inter-State sale merely due to separate local tax laws. The petitioners&#039; contention therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:46:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (11) TMI 47 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127990</link>
      <description>After State reorganisation, sales involving movement of goods between the Telangana and Andhra areas of the same State remained intra-State transactions. The court noted that the reorganisation law continued pre-existing local sales tax enactments in force in the transferred territories until adaptation, but that continuation did not alter the constitutional position that both areas formed one State. Because inter-State trade requires movement of goods from one State to another under the contract of sale, movement within the same State could not be treated as inter-State sale merely due to separate local tax laws. The petitioners&#039; contention therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>