<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (9) TMI 43 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127988</link>
    <description>Article 286(1)(b) exemption applies only where the sale itself occasions and forms part of the import movement; a sale made merely for import or preceding the import transaction does not qualify, so the claimed import-based exemption failed. Sales of goods delivered for consumption in Bihar remained taxable because the Article 286(2) restriction was treated as having been removed for the relevant assessment periods by the validation and continuance measures in force. On the set-off question, unshelled groundnuts and oil seeds were treated as the same commercial description, and refund or set-off was available where tax had already been paid on the earlier taxed commodity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:27:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (9) TMI 43 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127988</link>
      <description>Article 286(1)(b) exemption applies only where the sale itself occasions and forms part of the import movement; a sale made merely for import or preceding the import transaction does not qualify, so the claimed import-based exemption failed. Sales of goods delivered for consumption in Bihar remained taxable because the Article 286(2) restriction was treated as having been removed for the relevant assessment periods by the validation and continuance measures in force. On the set-off question, unshelled groundnuts and oil seeds were treated as the same commercial description, and refund or set-off was available where tax had already been paid on the earlier taxed commodity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>