<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (1) TMI 24 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127973</link>
    <description>For composition under the stock-based taxing scheme, only goods actually in the dealer&#039;s possession, custody or control on the relevant date could be counted. Sugar bags already booked and still in transit, with railway receipts not endorsed to the dealer and goods remaining in the vendors&#039; name, were excluded from the composition basis, giving the assessee partial relief. The governing instructions also treated total purchase value as the full cost of the stock, so freight and incidental charges were properly included in that value. The composition demand was therefore reduced only to the extent of the in-transit bags, while inclusion of freight and incidental charges was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:09:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (1) TMI 24 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127973</link>
      <description>For composition under the stock-based taxing scheme, only goods actually in the dealer&#039;s possession, custody or control on the relevant date could be counted. Sugar bags already booked and still in transit, with railway receipts not endorsed to the dealer and goods remaining in the vendors&#039; name, were excluded from the composition basis, giving the assessee partial relief. The governing instructions also treated total purchase value as the full cost of the stock, so freight and incidental charges were properly included in that value. The composition demand was therefore reduced only to the extent of the in-transit bags, while inclusion of freight and incidental charges was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>