<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (7) TMI 48 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127967</link>
    <description>The phrase &quot;as a direct result of a sale&quot; under section 18 was construed to qualify both the despatch or bringing of notified goods into Bombay and their actual delivery, so purchase tax liability arose only where that direct causal connection was established. On that reading, the assessee benefited from the interpretation, but the existing record did not show whether the vehicle had been brought into the State as a direct result of the sale. Because the necessary factual basis was incomplete, the liability question could not be finally determined and the matter required a supplementary finding on the remaining factual issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:46:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (7) TMI 48 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127967</link>
      <description>The phrase &quot;as a direct result of a sale&quot; under section 18 was construed to qualify both the despatch or bringing of notified goods into Bombay and their actual delivery, so purchase tax liability arose only where that direct causal connection was established. On that reading, the assessee benefited from the interpretation, but the existing record did not show whether the vehicle had been brought into the State as a direct result of the sale. Because the necessary factual basis was incomplete, the liability question could not be finally determined and the matter required a supplementary finding on the remaining factual issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>