<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (12) TMI 27 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127960</link>
    <description>Classification of machinery as electrical goods depends on its essential character, not merely on the use of electric motors as motive power. A lathe driven by a main motor and auxiliary motors remains machinery rather than an electrical good where the motors only supply power and the machine can be adapted to other power sources. Consequently, the lathe falls outside the category of electrical goods for the higher sales tax rate under the Madras General Sales Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:14:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (12) TMI 27 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127960</link>
      <description>Classification of machinery as electrical goods depends on its essential character, not merely on the use of electric motors as motive power. A lathe driven by a main motor and auxiliary motors remains machinery rather than an electrical good where the motors only supply power and the machine can be adapted to other power sources. Consequently, the lathe falls outside the category of electrical goods for the higher sales tax rate under the Madras General Sales Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>