<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (2) TMI 36 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127939</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC held that animals and birds in captivity are movable property and classified as &quot;goods&quot; under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Sales of these animals are subject to taxation under the Act, rejecting the argument that animate things are not included in the definition of &quot;goods&quot; in the Constitution. Petitions challenging the taxation were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (2) TMI 36 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127939</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC held that animals and birds in captivity are movable property and classified as &quot;goods&quot; under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Sales of these animals are subject to taxation under the Act, rejecting the argument that animate things are not included in the definition of &quot;goods&quot; in the Constitution. Petitions challenging the taxation were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>